![Close view of the [feature] on the [part family] machined for this project](/wp-content/uploads/mgz-media/mgz-exp-c02-s01-m01.png)
From Requirement to Acceptance: [Part Family]
[One-sentence project summary, to be supplied with the customer's permission].
This case follows a single drawing requirement from review to the record that accepted it. It is for engineers and quality teams who want to see how a requirement became evidence, and where that evidence stops.
Project at a Glance
This summary names the one requirement the case follows and the conditions it was accepted under. A buyer uses it to decide whether the requirement is close enough to their own to be worth reading further. Every row must come from the project record and be cleared for publication; values that cannot be published are left out, not approximated.
| Item | Project record |
|---|---|
| Part family and application area | [Part family and application area, to be supplied with permission] |
| Requirement followed | [Drawing requirement, with its feature and datum reference] |
| Material and finished condition | [Material, condition and finish as stated on the drawing] |
| Drawing revision | [Revision the parts were made and inspected to] |
| Quantity inspected | [Pieces inspected for this requirement, out of the quantity made] |
| Inspection method and record | [Method agreed and the record that reports it] |
| Accepted by | [Who accepted the result, by role] |
Publication
the values in this table are published with the customer's permission. [Permission scope, to be confirmed before publication].
The Requirement and Why It Decided Acceptance
This block must state the requirement exactly as the drawing defined it, the feature and datum it applied to, and why it decided whether the part could be used.
A redacted extract of the drawing with the followed requirement and its datum ballooned
A buyer needs to see the requirement in drawing terms, such as a relationship between an interface and its datum, not in descriptive terms like 'tight' or 'precise'. [Requirement as stated on the drawing, to be supplied with permission].
[Function of the feature in the assembly, to the level the customer agrees to publish]. If the requirement could be read more than one way, for example measured before or after finishing, or with the part free or restrained, the block must say which reading applied, because the inspection result depends on it.
Related: Waveguide and cavity machining · Radar antenna structural parts
What Was Clarified Before Machining
This block must show what the review settled before any material was cut: how the requirement would be read, in which part condition it would be checked, which method and coverage were agreed, and who was responsible for each step. A buyer comparing suppliers learns more from the questions raised at review than from a statement that the review took place.
[How the requirement and its datum were to be read]
[Stage and condition at which the requirement was checked]
[Method agreed, and how many pieces were to be checked]
[Who reviewed, who machined and who inspected]
Evidence required
the review notes or the clarification exchanged with the customer, redacted, with the drawing revision they refer to.
How the Feature Was Made
This block must describe, at summary level, how the manufacturing route kept the feature related to its datum: the setups involved, where the datum was established, and where in-process checks were placed.
The part in the setup that produced the followed feature, shown with permission
It states the route that was actually used for this part, not a general list of possible methods. [Manufacturing route for the feature, to be supplied with permission].
[In-process checks and any adjustment made during the run, if the customer agrees to publish them]. Machine names alone do not belong here; if a machine is named, the block must say which operation it performed on this part and why that operation mattered for the requirement.
Related: 5-axis machining
Inspection Record and Acceptance
This block must show the record that reported the requirement: the method, the part condition, the pieces measured and the result exactly as recorded, with its unit.
The redacted inspection report lines that report the followed requirement
It must also show who accepted the result and on what basis. [Inspection record lines for the requirement, to be supplied with permission].
[Acceptance decision and the record or message that confirms it]. If two measurements disagreed, such as the factory's and the customer's, the block states how the difference was resolved, but only if the customer agrees to publish it. A result reported without its method and condition is not enough for a buyer to compare.
Related: Quality and inspection
Evidence required
the redacted inspection report lines for this requirement and the customer's acceptance record.
What the Result Covers
This block draws the boundary of the result: [Revision, material, condition and quantity the accepted result applies to]. The result is evidence for that requirement, on those pieces, at that revision. It is not evidence for other features on the same part, other materials or a different size, and the block says so plainly rather than leaving the reader to infer a general capability.
[Any condition attached to the acceptance, such as an agreed deviation or a re-check, if published with permission]. A buyer should be able to quote this block to their own team as an accurate description of what was proved, and an equally accurate description of what was not tested in this project.
No outcome without a record
if the acceptance record cannot be published, the result is not stated.
What a New Project Must Confirm Again
A similar requirement on a new drawing is a new requirement. This block must list the conditions that would need to be confirmed again before the result of this case is treated as relevant, so a buyer can check their own part against each one. [Conditions specific to this project that limit reuse, to be supplied].
Datum scheme: whether the new drawing relates the feature to the same kind of datum.
Material and condition: whether the material, its condition and the finish sequence match.
Size and access: whether the feature size and tool access are comparable.
Method and coverage: whether the same inspection method and number of pieces apply.
What to Send for a Similar Requirement
If your drawing carries a requirement like the one in this case, start with that requirement rather than the whole part. Describe the feature, its datum reference, the part condition it applies to and the record your team needs to accept it. Add the material and quantity. A written description is enough for a first message; the drawing can follow by the method you agree.
Discuss a Similar Drawing Requirement
Describe the requirement, the feature and datum it applies to, and the record your team needs to accept it.
Sales contact (pending)
Name, role and photo to be confirmed
Drawings are optional for an initial discussion.
Start with the information you have; file exchange can be arranged afterward.
Name to be confirmed
Sales, company name to be confirmed
- Add the material and quantity; the drawing can be exchanged once the method is agreed.
Project Inquiry
Fields marked are required.